Pride and Prejudice

1940

1h 58m

IMDb RATING

6.9/10

145

YOUR RATING

Rate

POPULARITY

Play trailer

1 Video

31 Images

Drama

Romance

Mrs. Bennet wishes to wed her five unmarried daughters and is overjoyed when a wealthy bachelor begins living nearby, but misunderstandings make happiness difficult.

Directors

Robert Z. Leonard

Writers

Helen Jerome(adaptation by)

Jane Austen(novel by)

Aldous Huxley(screenplay by)

Stars

Greer Garson

Laurence Olivier

Mary Boland

See production, box office & company info

Videos1

Trailer
Watch Pride and Prejudice Official Trailer #1 - Laurence Olivier Movie (1940) HD

Top cast

Elizabeth Bennet

Mr. Darcy

Mrs. Bennet

Lady Catherine de Bourgh

Maureen O'Sullivan

Jane Bennet

Ann Rutherford

Lydia Bennet

Frieda Inescort

Miss Caroline Bingley

Mr. Bennet

Mrs. Collins

Kitty Bennet

Mr. Collins

Mr. George Wickham

Mr. Denny

Sir William Lucas

Lady Lucas

Mrs. Philips

Mary Bennet

Mr. Bingley

Directors

Robert Z. Leonard

Writers

Helen Jerome(adaptation by)

Jane Austen(novel by)

Aldous Huxley(screenplay by)

All cast & crew

Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

**A first adaptation of Jane Austen's greatest work, which is riddled with problems, but is competent, pragmatic and very elegant. Thought of as a comedy, it was thought of the wrong way.** At this point, I believe that even those who have never read a Jane Austen novel will surely agree that the writer is, quite simply, one of the most distinguished in the classical pantheon of the English language. “Pride and Prejudice” is a novel that has been adapted to film and TV several times, and each production had its pros and cons. One cannot ignore this production, however, because it was truly the first to transport romance from paper to celluloid. Its impact, at the time, was enormous, it was a great success and even helped to make the original book better known and popular outside England. I won't waste my time explaining the plot, which is well known to everyone who has seen at least one of the most recent adaptations of the book. What I can say is that this film, with its short duration, ends up not being able to do justice to the original material, which is largely hidden. It couldn't be otherwise, anyway, but director Robert Z. Leonard even cut out passages that were quite important for the general understanding of the plot! Another problem with this film is how the production simply didn't care about choosing actors who fit the characters. Concerned with attracting the public and making the film work, the producers chose famous, recognizable actors, even if they are clearly older than the characters they embodied. “Safe bets”, as I sometimes call them, because they combined popularity with assured talent: it's no wonder that, each in their own way, they managed to give us good performances. I particularly liked Greer Garson, who I feel made a genuine effort to look younger and more rebellious, as her character demanded. Also, Edna May Oliver deserves praise for the way she gave life to the imposing and arrogant Lady Catherine. Maureen O'Sullivan, Edmund Gwenn and Edward Ashley do an equally good job, and despite not liking the overly pompous and arrogant ways, Lawrence Olivier was competent as Darcy. Technically, the film has no major flaws or demerits worth mentioning. Filmed in black and white when originally planned to use color (due to allegedly running out of celluloid due to the production of “Gone With The Wind”), the film has very good cinematography and was elegantly shot. The soundtrack is not bad, being within what we expect to find in a film from the early Forties. However, I cannot fail to criticize, on the negative side, the option of temporally placing the action thirty years after the period in which everything takes place in the book, even though I understand the convenience, for the entire production, of being able to recycle part of the costumes used in “Gone With The Wind”.

FilipeManuelNeto26 Feb, 2023